Inbox

Everything proposed for your case waits here until you decide. Nothing becomes evidence until you accept it.

Where candidates come from

• Connectors you added on Sources (a repo's stars, a paper's citations, a press page).
• Files and emails you drop on the page: certificates, letters, screenshots, PDFs or .eml files. Each gets a suggested criterion and stage; emails are checked for a verified sender.
• Your mail, when Gmail is connected and the daily opportunity check is on: invitations to judge, review or speak, each marked verified, unconfirmed or suspicious.
• The agent (chat, missions) and MCP clients like Claude Code, through propose_context.

Candidates are grouped by criterion. Each shows where it came from, a confidence, its evidence type and stage (for example STAGE: INVITED), and, for mail, the sender check.

Deciding

Button	What happens
Accept	The claims behind it are approved, a capture file is written to evidence/<criterion>/, and it's logged as an exhibit. The scoreboard updates.
Edit	Change the criterion, evidence type, date, title or summary before accepting.
Snooze 7d	Hide it for a week.
Reject	It leaves the Inbox and its claims are marked rejected; the same item isn't proposed again.

Expand a candidate to see the exact claims behind it, each quoting its source word for word.

An invitation is not a completion

An accepted invitation stays at the invited stage and doesn't count toward a criterion until you upload the proof that it happened (a thank-you note, a certificate, the program). Accepting records your decision; it doesn't certify legal sufficiency.

With a long Inbox, review in bulk: group candidates, filter them, select many and accept or reject them as one batch, with one Undo for the batch. See Bulk review.

More: Review.